100 thoughts on “CAUGHT ON CAMERA: Man handcuffed after ‘illegally eating sandwich’ on train platform”

  1. The girl was absolutely CORRECT, he abandoned an intoxicated person to harass a man for eating a sandwich. The Supreme Court would have a field day if this guy brought a case and it went that far….reasonable suspicion, due process, first amendment, the list goes on.

  2. Time to flip Bart police. Old foggies just want to spice their day up with the major arrest of someone eating a sandwich! Lucky it wasn't me.

  3. They need to handcuff those drug addicts, and nasty homeless that bother everybody in the subway station! All that fucken money we pay to walk to a station that’s dirty and smells like shit with crime walking everywhere

  4. if suspect is white = give it a verbal warning, friendly pat on back, & let him leave.

    when suspect is black: grab onto his cloths, call for back up, and arrest him.

  5. What if his blood sugar was low, therefore he HAD to consume something for his well being? Would they harass/arrest a baby if it was eating (breastfeeding) on the platform? This is plain and simple the stereotype of "you had better respect my authority" … or "I'll make sure to ruin your day, inconvenience the hell out of you, and cost you money; as a lesson to show me respect." I guess the civilian is lucky the officer didn't just shoot him (if this had happened at night, the officer would have 'claimed' he mistook the sandwich for a weapon). It is sadly hilarious when you ask "Why am I being arrested?" And you are given the answer: "For resisting arrest." What? Being arrested for resisting arrest? WHAT WAS THE FIRST F—ING ARREST FOR?! You know… the one I supposedly "resisted"!

  6. Alfred E Neuman Negro Snowflake needs his Egg a Muffin. Rules are for others. What was preventing him from putting his sandwich away? Other than he's an ill-mannered dickhead. Girlfriend digs it when he gets her fat clitty between that huge gap in his teeth and tongues it hard. Civilization declines apace.

  7. We believe that the perpetrator here identified as D. McCormick is in face one David McCormick of Santa Ana https://copblaster.com/blast/3288/bart-cop-david-mccormick-arrested-a-man-for-eating-while-black

  8. i can't believe the Bart police let him eat the evidence. now they are going to need to hold him in till it comes out so they can process the evidence for the jury trial.. ask for a jury trial and a real judge.. not a judge pro tem or a court commissioner ..

  9. Have they been on Bart with the junkies, sleeping people, people firing blunt, people eat in bart all the time, loud music, passed out on the floor amongst the many other things?

  10. Officer just standing there holding his backpack just to instigate an excuse to further create problem. Using this innocent victim as a tool for their corruption

  11. He lives in San Francisco and uses homophobic slurs. Screw this guy. The cop was wrong too, but I hope one day we can fight our battles without spewing hate!! They both suck!!!

  12. According to CNN affiliate, the guy used homophobic slurs towards the officer. Why isn't there an outrage from Blacks? Blacks want outrage against racism but remain silent on homophobia. Nearly 20 trans women have died mostly Black… you never see Black people be outraged. And they will call this White supremacy… but using homophobic slurs isn't White supremacy thing? And for him to use homophobic slurs in San Francisco… of all places.🤔🤔🤔

  13. Laughing at all you Jussie Smolletts who have to lie to defend the violator.

    The officer ignored a drunk passenger to target this person:
    LIE

    The officer ignored white violators to target this black violator:
    LIE

    The officer ignored all kinds of serious crimes to target this person:
    LIE

    And the biggest lie of all:
    The officer arrested this person for eating:
    LIE

    The truth is very simple but doesn't make for a sensational headline and apparently is beyond the comprehension of many people. The violator was cited for violating BART rules. No one else was present violating BART rules. The officer has cited other people of all races and has pursued and will continue to pursue people committing serious crimes. There were no serious crimes in view of the officer. Citing the violator in no way caused a more serious lawbreaker to evade the law. The violator was arrested for refusing to obey the lawful commands of the police, specifically not providing identification to be cited. Further, the violator was given not one but two warnings to put away his food which the violator steadfastly refused to do.

  14. The cop was doing his job. If there is a regulation that states that you cannot eat in that area, don't eat. And if you're gonna eat, be ready to accept the consequences.
    If you do some research, the cop actually gave him a verbal warning and walked away the first time. The guy ignored it and hence the situation escalated.
    This has absolutely nothing to do with race. Nothing. The lesson here is don't break the rules and don't behave like a neanderthal.

  15. Pig was irrational. Pig should’ve just given a friendly warning. These pigs are given so much discretion, he should’ve used it for a stupid rule like that.

  16. Clearly this police officer is in the wrong and now letting the spirit of deception influence him by communicating a “script” which is prepared for all law enforcement officers to follow/use when they over reach with authority and violate a citizens rights. This officer is similar to a Nazi. This officer and the department he is employed with violated this citizen’s US Constitutional rights endowed to him by the Creator: 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 8th, 14th Amendments, just to name a few, that were violated.

    Can you believe this UNUSUAL law! No eating … I bet when scrutinized the courts will find this “no eating” is a safety suggestion posted by the train corporation to prevent possible choking and not an official California law.

    The United States Constitution is the framework of how all states are to be fairly administrated to Justice. The US Constitution since December 15, 1791 specifically speaks about unusual punishments in the Eight Amendment and this law of “no eating” is UNUSUAL. Thus this unusual law of “no eating” and those who enforce it are ready to BE scrutinized.

    Description
    The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits the federal government from imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments. This amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the United States Bill of Rights.

  17. So, now the masses want food to be consumed in trains and platforms? That can easily be arranged….but please don't complain when your work clothes get soiled from mustard and ketchup etc. That's the way you want to roll.

  18. Smoking meth is fine, stealing peoples phones are fine, organized panhandling is fine but eating a SANDWICH is what sparks the arrest. Ridiculous.

  19. Add this to the list of unenforceable laws on the books. People aren't going to take any laws seriously when there are so many others that are being ignored. But I don't necessarily blame the cops. It's someone higher up who's telling them to IGNORE the homeless drug addicts or mentally ill when they break the law. Focus should not be on the cops. It should be on the laws themselves and the people above, including politicians, who are acting like they have nothing to do with it.

  20. fuck that dude and the bitch with the camera .. basically just fuck SF .. "one day a real rain will come and wash all the scum off the streets"- travis bickle

  21. White person makes homophobic slurs: loses job

    Black person makes homophobic slurs: becomes victim/hero and has protests in his honor

    Do you know what I would hate about being black? That nobody has any standards for me. That's the most racist part about this.

  22. this cop looks almost like the guy who were on bart telling a guy that he couldnt eat his Burrito on the train last year.

  23. I know we can`t eat on the train, but why we can't eat on the platform, why ??? I ride Bart never see a sigh said can't eat on the platform, ok boomer…what is the point.

  24. This dirty nasty porce of shit pig will get his karma double hard !!!!!! He just harrased a innocent citizen. Fuck him and his dog and his while family, karmaaa

  25. IT'S PEOPLE LIKE THIS '' N-WORD'' WHO ''DEFEND'' HIM IN ''BREAKING THE LAW'' AND /OR '' RULES'' THAT WORK AND APPLY TO '' EVERYBODY'' EXCEPT THIS '' N-WORD'' BECAUSE HE IS THE REASON ''WHY'' WE HAVE AND USE THAT WORD…LAWS/RULES ONLY APPLY TO '' WHITE FOLKS'' AND THESE DISGUSTING IDIOTS WHO ''DEFEND'' HIM AND PULL THE '' RACE CARD'' NOW ARE AS DISGUSTING AS HE IS…REASLLY SAD AND WRONG..RULES/LAWS ARE FOR ''ALL' PEOPLE..GET IT..YOU DESERVE THE TICKET.FUC'NUTS. I'D LOVE TO SHOVE THAT SANDWICH IN YOUR GAP-TOOTH FACE..PUNK..DONE NUTT'IN WRONG.

  26. In the land of the free and home of the brave, it is now illegal to drive while black, walk while black, eat while black. Long live AmeriKKKa!

  27. Obviously this guy should have bowed down. He was being uppity and disrespecting the law. Has nothing to do with race. Cops are god sent

  28. That's why cops get killed on the job. Bad cops using excessive force make people afraid to follow their instructions. Creating tensions between the populace and the people who are supposed to protect and serve. I'm just happy that rent a cop didn't have a gun otherwise he would of shot that man for eating a sandwich.

  29. The only reason there's this Rule on Bart anyway is so that they (Bart) don't have to hire janitors to clean up the train. There's garbage cans on the platform so you don't leave trash on the train. The state of California has subsidised Bart by giving them grants and bonds to build up its infrastructure. Bart has in turn increased its fairs and increased its cost for parking. Bart makes money off of the taxes we give them and off of the tolls we pay by using it. Bart is corrupt, they haven't added in any new lines In over a decade. And the line they are proposing is ANOTHER tube from San Francisco to Alameda, which is far more expensive than adding a line ABOVE GROUND to the north and south Bay respectively. In closing FUCK Bart and any rule or law they try to impose on others for the purpose of control. America's oligarchy will fall soon, and the corrupt individuals whom have gained the most off of the backs of the meek will fall with it.

  30. Now they change the story to say he matched a suspect. These asshole pigs are bold faced liars and should be fired. A lawsuit is in order here. The police are crooks and liars.

  31. Was the officee trying to give him a ticket before recording? If the officer was trying to write him a ticket and he started not cooperating with the officer then the arrest is justified. If the officer just saw him eating the sandwich on the street and immediately grabbed his bag and telling him you are arrested, then the cop should be fired. Again, we dont have all the details what led to his arrest so people should stop judging

  32. Damn black people thinking they could eat a sandwich anywhere they like, next think you know they might also want to sit and drink at starbucks, or somewhere worse like Cheesecake factory. Thank you fine officer for arresting this criminal, never mind jeffrey epstein cough cough suicide investigation, this is the real shit right here people, this is why we pay these officers for, and I for one fell so much safer now.

  33. There were probably signs indicating that no food was allowed in the station or on the train, but as you can see in this video he doesn't give a crap and thinks he can do what he wants – if everyone were like him, you'd have a filthy, third-world-looking, littered, rat-filled, graffitted s*hole subway system, kind of like they do in NYC because of those people. Kudos to the officer for doing his job.

  34. Fuck those "cops" ….what a load of horseshit… Props to the woman filming …she was calm, poignant and captured all the relevant footage that we need, to ONCE AGAIN, see how completely fucked up law enforcement is…

  35. A lot of people here saying that it was good that he was arrested as eating makes public places filthy but how does eating do that?, isn't it littering that does that?
    Last time I ate it went into my mouth and down my throat not onto the floor and if it did go on the floor then get me for littering.
    This whole thing is just bizarre and the law should never have been made in the first place. I get it if you are all crammed together on an actual train and someone is eating a big mac millimeters away from your face but the platform?

  36. All these softass cops needs to be terminated, messing with A Black Man For Eating A Sausage Egg And Cheese Mc Muffin Sandwich on The BART Subway Platform!! Bullshit Bullshit Bullshit!! !! !!

  37. These laws are fucking stupid and these officers are a waste of tax dollars. Welcome to the police state of California.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *